Same with me. In survey analysis you have more ad-hoc analyses , so less
repetition.
I am far more interested in using MR and CTABLES.
- ftr
On 08/11/2015 18:21, Matthias Faeth wrote:
I personally never use production jops and also never save .spv files
but export results to excel. But I might be untypical.
Matthias Fäth
Im Mediapark 12
50670 Köln
t: 0221-2907973
m: 0171-9832175
e: m.fa...@gmx.de <mailto:m.fa...@gmx.de>
2015-11-08 18:15 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu
<mailto:b...@cs.stanford.edu>>:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:10:43AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 01:36:01AM +0000, Charles Johnson wrote:
>
> From my point of view, production jobs are very useful to
> automate lengthy and complex processes that are made
> recurrently. As PSPP add more commands, the more useful
they will
> be in the future.
>
>
> How would they be more useful than any general method of automation?
I would guess that SPSS users are used to them and that they may have
some that they consider valuable.
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org <mailto:Pspp-users@gnu.org>
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
