Wow, thanks T.J.!!
your answer makes a lot of sense.. but, now, how I am supposed to pass
a function name instead of a string?
I'm sorry if the question sounds stupid to you but I don't know how to
achieve this target.

Thanks

Omar

On Mar 24, 12:55 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this code:
>
> function click() {
>         var opt = {
>                         method: 'get',
>                         onCreate: 'create',
>                         onLoading: 'loading',
>                         onSuccess: 'sucess',
>                     onException: 'error'
>                 };
>         var login = new jsTTALogin(URL, opt);
>
> }
>
> ...you're providing strings instead of functions. That's causing an
> exception, which Prototype then tries to handle via `onException` --
> but `onException` is *also* a string, not a function. The error
> message in Firefox+Firebug is wrong (interestingly). It's triggered
> from line 1540 in Prototype.js:
>
> 1539 dispatchException: function(exception) {
> 1540   (this.options.onException || Prototype.emptyFunction)(this,
> exception);
> 1541   Ajax.Responders.dispatch('onException', this, exception);
> 1542 }
>
> ...which resolves to:
>
>     "error"(this, exception)
>
> ...and of course, "error" is a string, not a function.
>
> So that's what's going wrong. It looks to me like you're trying to
> pass the names of functions that exist in your subclass as options.
> That's not how you reference functions, you need to provide a function
> reference.
>
> Off-topic: I'm a bit surprised that `initTTA` in jsTTA.js works (but
> it does seem to), it seems to me that it's trying to call `eval` on a
> script element, which I would expect to have...undefined results. You
> can (and probably should) drop that `eval` and it should work just
> fine, more 
> here:http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:how-to-load-scripts-dynami...
>
> HTH,
> --
> T.J. Crowder
> Independent Software Consultant
> tj / crowder software / comwww.crowdersoftware.com
>
> On Mar 24, 10:45 am, Omar Adobati <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi T.J.
> > I've set up a small minimum failing test here:http://www.adobati.it/test/
> > <http://www.adobati.it/test/>I have the same error as described above:
>
> > ==
> > Prototype.emptyFunction is not a function
> > (this.options.onException || Prototype.emptyFunction)(this, exception);
> > ==
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Omar
>
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:26, T.J. Crowder <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Again, why not just create a minimum failing test case? Start here[1],
> > > add your subclass, and if it breaks post the code.
>
> > > [1]http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/self-contained-test-page
>
> > > -- T.J.
>
> > > On Mar 23, 4:39 pm, 0m4r <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > fixing a typo:
>
> > > > ==
> > > > var options = {user: 'myuser', pwd:'mypwd', type:'myType',
> > > > onSuccess:'success', onException:'error'};
> > > > var url = 'http://www.url.com';
> > > > var myAjax = new myAjaxR(url, options)
> > > > ==
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<prototype-scriptaculou
> > >  s%[email protected]>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Reply via email to