To clarify, my run was also using the x86_64 / amd64 version, using a VM. Neither of us have been able to reproduce what Andrew saw, so unless we can get a better idea what it is specifically then I am inclined to say that we proceed. If there is an issue and it can be identified, I'm sure it will be joined by others once a larger group of folks can actually get there hands on a release, and I'll happilly cut a 0.10.1 to address them if fixes are available.
Robbie On 13 August 2015 at 20:05, Ted Ross <tr...@redhat.com> wrote: > I ran the tests under Ubuntu 14.04 (for amd64) running an x86_64 Linux > kernel (using Docker). All of the tests, including the SSL tests pass. > > -Ted > > > On 08/13/2015 09:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >> I have run up a fresh Ubuntu 14.04.3 install didn't see any issues >> (once I figured out what packages to install to get the tests all >> running). Can you elaborate on the problem you are seeing? >> >> Robbie >> >> On 12 August 2015 at 22:41, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've tested proton-c on ubuntu1404, ubuntu1204 & FreeBSD 10.1p17 >>> >>> Ubuntu 1204 builds and ctests fine. >>> This is our the OS on our travis CI so it's not a surprise it works. >>> >>> Ubuntu 1404 - I'm having problems with the "python" tests and SSL - >>> investigating whether this is my config or something more. This is a >>> little worrying >>> >>> FreeBSD - I'm getting test failures in >>> proton_tests.messenger.SelectableMessengerTest.testSelectable* >>> This might reflect some difference in poll() behaviour. >>> >>> I'm also getting failures in >>> ...*_valgrind with output like this... >>> AssertionError: Unexpected input while waiting for receiver to >>> initialize: ==12271== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 >>> >>> Which seems like valgrind detected use of an uninitialised value. >>> I don't know it this is in proton or one of the lib it uses yet. >>> >>> Not sure if FreeBSD is important enough to care too much, but it should >>> work. >>> >>> [so no -1 yet, but investigating. IMO the FreeBSD failures aren't >>> enough to reject the release, but the Ubuntu failures might be] >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 21:08 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I have put up a third cut for 0.10, please test it and vote >>>> accordingly. >>>> >>>> Since RC2 there have been fixes for PROTON-978, PROTON-975, and >>>> PROTON-899. >>>> >>>> The release archive and sig/checksums can be grabbed from: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.10-rc3/ >>>> >>>> Maven artifacts for the Java bits can be found in a temporary staging >>>> repo at: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1042 >>>> >>>> It is tagged as 0.10-rc3. You may need to fetch the tags explicitly >>>> to >>>> see it, e.g: "git fetch --tags" >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Robbie >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org >
