It seems that by using field numbers instead, changing a field name would not be a breaking change.
So instead of `foo.bar.buzz` we could do something like `2.1.4`. rel: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/master/src/google/protobuf/field_mask.proto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/3e08e634-d5a3-4751-a8df-a85f697facdan%40googlegroups.com.
