Sorry, I did not investigate it further (I don't currently have a use case of it - I was just testing the support).
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Arpit, > > Did you have any luck? > > > On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 3:24:09 PM UTC-7, Arpit Baldeva wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Are custom options supported with protobuf JS? I have my proto files that >> work fine with C++/C# so I don't think it is a syntax issue. >> >> However, when I try to run the grpc sample (I am not sure it is a grpc >> issue though), I get an error similar to https://github.com/dcodeIO/ >> protobuf.js/issues/383 >> >> Parse error at line 5: illegal option name: (toplevel_3.options)., >> >> >> Thanks. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/protobuf/TP1rViMydKM/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
