Hey Feng, Can you please tell what's the incompatibility between 
protoc_linux.2.5 and protobuf-java_3.x? I upgraded protobuf-java to 3.5 and 
tried to use it with protoc_linux.2.5 and I was able to compile, read/write 
with no issues. 

$protoc_linux --version
libprotoc 2.5.0

<dependency>
                <groupId>com.google.protobuf</groupId>
                <artifactId>protobuf-java</artifactId>
                <version>3.5.0</version>
</dependency>

On Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:10:25 UTC-7, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Scott Sue <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Feng,
>>
>> Apologies, what I was meaning was that with the introduction of protobuf 
>> 3.2.0 now, is 3.2.0 binary compatible with protobuf 2.5.0?  Or does you 
>> original message reply still hold true?
>>
> No, 3.2.0 runtime is not binary compatible with 2.5.0 generated code. It 
> is only binary compatible with older 3.x version generated code, such as 
> 3.0, or 3.1.
>  
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Scott
>>
>> SCOTT SUE
>> CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
>>
>> Support Line : +44(0) 2031 371 603
>> Mobile : +852 9611 3969
>>
>> 9/F, 33 Lockhart Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong
>> www.celer-tech.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 Apr 2017, at 2:08 AM, Feng Xiao <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Scott Sue <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Feng,
>>>
>>> Is this still the case considering that 3.2.0 is out that allows the 
>>> version number to be used by protoc?
>>>
>> Not sure what you are asking, but 3.0.0 generated code should work with 
>> 3.2.0 runtime and 3.2.0 protoc will work with any old version plugins.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> General
>>> * Added protoc version number to protoc plugin protocol. It can be used 
>>> by
>>> protoc plugin to detect which version of protoc is used with the plugin 
>>> and
>>> mitigate known problems in certain version of protoc. 
>>> Regards,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:00:23 AM UTC+8, Feng Xiao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jeff Olson <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've read through the release documents 
>>>>> <https://github.com/google/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.0.0> for Protocol 
>>>>> Buffers v3.0.0 but I can't find any statements regrading binary 
>>>>> compatibility with version 2.6.1 (or earlier). There are a couple of 
>>>>> things 
>>>>> I'd like to know:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. If I dump a 3.0.0 version of the 
>>>>>    com.google.protobuf/protobuf-java.jar in a project the depends on java 
>>>>>    classes generated by protoc v2.6.1 (or v2.5.0) will everything still 
>>>>> work? 
>>>>>    That is, is the java runtime backwards compatible?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately no. The 3.0.0 version protobuf-java.jar will not work 
>>>> with java classes generated by protoc v2.6.1 (or v2.5.0). For those who 
>>>> can 
>>>> not upgrade to 3.0 directly, we are considering releasing a 2.7 version 
>>>> which provides the following compatibility guarantees:
>>>> 1. 2.7 protobuf-java.jar will be compatible with java classes generated 
>>>> by protoc 2.6.1 and protoc 2.5.0.
>>>> 2. 3.0 protobuf-java.jar will be compatible with java classes generated 
>>>> by protoc 2.7
>>>>
>>>> I.e., it allows you to upgrade to 3.0 in two steps: upgrade to 2.7, and 
>>>> after all your dependencies are upgraded to either 2.7 or 3.0, you can 
>>>> upgrade to 3.0 as well. It's not an ideal solution, but we hope it can 
>>>> help 
>>>> ease the migration pain for some users. I'm testing this 2.7 version in a 
>>>> github branch right now: https://github.com/google/protobuf/tree/2.7.0. 
>>>> If you are interested, feel free to test it and any feedback is welcome.
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Is the binary wire format the same for purely proto2 messages? 
>>>>>    If I serialize messages generated from proto2 sources using the 3.0.0 
>>>>> java 
>>>>>    runtime will clients using protobuf v2.6.1 be able to decode the 
>>>>> messages 
>>>>>    correctly?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. The wire format stays the same as long as you are using the 
>>>> proto2 syntax version.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Protocol Buffers" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> *This message, including any attachments, may include private, 
>>> privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the 
>>> personal and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader 
>>> of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
>>> any review, use, dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this 
>>> message or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you 
>>> are not an intended recipient or have received this communication in error, 
>>> please immediately notify the sender by telephone and/or a reply email and 
>>> permanently delete the original message, including any attachments, without 
>>> making a copy.*
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Protocol Buffers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>>> <javascript:>.
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *This message, including any attachments, may include private, privileged 
>> and confidential information and is intended only for the personal and 
>> confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this 
>> message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>> review, use, dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this 
>> message or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you 
>> are not an intended recipient or have received this communication in error, 
>> please immediately notify the sender by telephone and/or a reply email and 
>> permanently delete the original message, including any attachments, without 
>> making a copy.*
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to