One parameter method works fine if we start with proto and define the services. But, most of the code is usually evolved, For ex: Existing distributed java services, who wants to use protobuf, instead of RMI/java-Serialization. This feature is very useful in doing that.
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 11:23:47 PM UTC+5:30, Feng Xiao wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Marvin Somebody <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Can you tell me what's the reason for your decision? >> > We decided against it because such a feature will complicate proto syntax, > API and implementation without bring any true value. > > >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Protocol Buffers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
