On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:23 PM, V.B. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Greetings all, > We are using version 2.5. What is the most efficient way (*i.e.*single > copy operation, no extra byte arrays) to construct a ByteString from > a specific number of bytes in an InputStream? The various versions of > ByteString.readFrom() drain the stream completely, which is not what we > need; any data past *N* bytes should remain in the stream. The > ByteString.readChunk() method looks like it will work if we simply give > it *N* as the chunkSize parameter. Unfortunately, ByteString.readChunk()is > declared private, so that method is not currently an option. Is there > another option that I just haven't found in the source code yet? > How about create an wrapper InputStream that only reads N bytes from the original InputStream and provide the wrapper to BytesString.readFrom()? > > (Thanks for taking the time to read this question.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
