> This metric provides the date and time of a specific iLO alert but the 
data is present on OCTET format like this :
> 0x07E7051B0801

I found the following MIB description here 
<https://www.circitor.fr/Mibs/Html/C/CPQHLTH-MIB.php>:

"The time stamp when the event log entry was first created. field octets 
contents range ===== ====== ======== ===== 1 1-2 year 0..65536 2 3 month 
1..12 3 4 day 1..31 4 5 hour 0..23 5 6 minute 0..59 The year field is set 
with the most significant octet first. A value of 0 in the year indicates 
an unknown time stamp."

The sample value you have given is as follows, which looks plausible:
0x07e7 = 2023 (year)
0x05 = 5 (month)
0x1b = 27 (day)
0x08 = 8 (hour)
0x01 = 1 (minute)

Parsing this as a DisplayString isn't going to help you though, because 
then it would treat each byte as a single ASCII character, which will give 
you garbage (as you've found).

When it's left as the default OctetString format, how do the labels display?

If it looks like foo="07e7051b0801" then you'll be able to split the label 
in Prometheus using metric relabelling and label_replace(), but 
unfortunately it will still be in hex.

But more importantly: if this value is actually the timestamp of a log 
event, then it's completely unsuitable for use in metrics, because of huge 
cardinality (a whole set of new time series every minute). You'll need to 
drop it anyway. If you want to keep it, then you'll need to use something 
other than Prometheus (e.g. Loki or Elasticsearch).

However if this value is the time that the logging system started (and 
therefore is stable, except for when the system reboots) then it's fine to 
use as a label, although not especially interesting.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/3f4afce5-f5a4-4332-a9d4-29ffd5a4ae42n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to