They do need to believe. 

Or keep your trap shut. Sorry but making up posts for a fake group sounds kind 
of stupid. 

Are they going to vote on a display for gravestones next?  I'll give them Null 
as a symbol. 



Sent from my iPhone
Stephen Russell
901.246-0159


On Jun 18, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Dan Covill <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 6/18/2011 6:59 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>> But the rules specify that the chaplain be from a "faith group", or at
>> least the article says this. How do non-believers form a "faith group"?
>> 
>> If you accuse an atheist of "faith" on this list he gets angry. There
>> was that "not collecting stamps" analogy some time ago, if you recall it.
> 
> Hi, Pete
> 
> The problem is that the "rules" were written by people who, probably 
> with all good intentions, assumed that everyone had a religion, and thus 
> worded their rules accordingly.  The women's lib problem with words like 
> "chairman" and "one man, one vote" is the same thing.
> 
> There have been problems at several military posts with high-level 
> officers using their authority to promote their particular flavor of 
> religion, specifically at the Air Force Academy several years ago where 
> cadets were pressured to join an evangelist sect (I forget which one).
> 
> I doubt if many civilian atheists want or need a "chaplain", but the 
> minority of non-believers in the military feel they need some defense 
> from the pressure by officers to conform.  And all of us need a world in 
> which "none" is an acceptable answer to "which religion?"
> 
> Dan
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to