It's only cheaper while it's there....

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Michael Madigan
Sent: 19 October 2010 09:44
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] About energy

Price breaks and subsidies have nothing to do with the price of oil.  Oil 
prices are set on a commodities exchange.  Subsidies only make Exxon more 
profitable, but it doesn't do a thing to change the price of oil.   OPEC keeps 
the price of oil high while there is plenty of oil to go around.  They 
purposely keep oil in the ground to keep the price high.

Even after OPEC has artificially inflated oil prices, IT IS STILL CHEAPER THAN 
SOLAR.




--- On Mon, 10/18/10, Fred Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Fred Taylor <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] About energy
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 11:16 PM And you think Big Oil doesn't 
> get subsidies and tax breaks?
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/04/business/04bptax.html
> 
> Fred
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Michael Madigan 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > He's a total loon
> >
> > Oil is a commodity, it's value is determined on a
> commodities exchange and is subject to speculation, its price has 
> nothing to do with subsidies.  Oil is much cheaper than solar per 
> kilowatt hour.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 10/18/10, Ricardo Araoz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Ricardo Araoz <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [OT] About energy
> >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 6:46 PM On 18/10/10 17:23, Michael 
> >> Madigan
> >> wrote:
> >> > When will the ecoweenies realize that no one
> will use
> >> solar until it's cheap enough to compete with
> other
> >> fuel.  Solar has been subsidized for 30 years and
> is
> >> still not cheap enough for the average person.   It's great if you 
> >> have a log cabin and it's too expensive to bring a power line to
> it, or if
> >> you're in the middle of the dessert, but not for
> the average
> >> person yet.   It will be, but not yet.
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> Which really proves my point that the asshole did
> not read
> >> the article.
> >> HEY KNUCKLEHEAD!!! KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK......
> >> Read the damned article and stop spitting. It says
> there
> >> that oil has
> >> been subsidized THRICE AS MUCH as solar.
> >> Can you read? hehehe...
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --- On Mon, 10/18/10, Stephen Russell <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> From: Stephen Russell <[email protected]>
> >> >> Subject: Re: [OT] About energy
> >> >> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> >> >> Date: Monday, October 18, 2010, 9:41 AM On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 
> >> >> 5:03 PM, Ricardo Araoz <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On 17/10/10 18:09, Michael Madigan
> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> I guess the reason solar isn't
> catching on
> >> is Karl
> >> >>>>
> >> >> Rove's fault instead of the fact that is
> costs 5
> >> times more
> >> >> than coal.
> >> >>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>> Did you *really* read the *two* pages
> of the
> >> article?
> >> >>>
> >> >> Did you miss the
> >> >>
> >> >>> part about subsidies being paid to
> coal and
> >> petrol
> >> >>>
> >> >> companies? Do you
> >> >>
> >> >>> have attention problems? Are you kind
> of an
> >> ass.....
> >> >>>
> >> >> Oooops! Sorry! I
> >> >>
> >> >>> got carried away with asking ;c)
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to