>> So you agree with me that it only shifts the load from the server to the >> client and you say that this is good in order to use today's grid >> computer servers. I agree, but I'm not working for govt nor huge >> multinationals that may have the need for this massive data workload. So >> I think we may agree that this technology will be worth learning to the >> small subset of coders that work with massive data. The rest of us >> mortals will get no real advantage from this technology except it may >> look good in our CVs > -------------------------- > > It ain't the meat it's the motion, that makes your baby wanna rock. > > It is not the size of the client but what you are doing for them.
o.O LINQ as an aid to foreplay. I did not see that angle before, thanks Steve... I once reported on a big, expensive framework upgrade project to a CIO who was pretty hot looking. I'm glad I did not use an analogy like that when justifying the upgrade to .NET 3.5, she was very sensitive about who she let rock her boat. Mostly, upper management... - Publius > > -- > Stephen Russell > > Sr. Production Systems Programmer > CIMSgts > > 901.246-0159 cell > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
