On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Rafael Copquin <[email protected]> wrote: > You and Stephen Russell made the same suggestion and I tried it. > > It works beautifully! > > I'll have to rewrite my error catching routine, but this is the way to go. > > Thank you both! > ---------------------
There was a big diff between our catch / finally. I clean the failed excel object in the catch and Alan put that to the finally. From my C# code I would encase my excel object in a using statement so it would ALWAYS clear all objects within the block when code was completed, and in the catch I make sure that it is cleared. Just to give you a heads up between the two suggestions. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer CIMSgts 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
