On 05/16/2010 07:18 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > http://www2.nationalreview.com/video/video_homie_051410_C.html >
That's called leading the witness, Pete, and that is not allowed in courts, nor should it be allow in congressional hearings. For example, if I ask you to reply to the following question with a yes or no answer, I'm leading you to respond in a way that foster fears/hate, (eg FUD) of "Radical Islam": #---------------------------- Question: Isn't it possible, Pete, that one of these three individual committed terrorist acts; because, they were influence to do so by "Radical Islam" LOL. Because only a yes or a no response is all, I've put those words in your month. #--------------------------- Why didn't the congressman just ask Attorney General Eric Holder if he had found any evidence linking the 3 suspect to "Radical Islam". Even if Attorney General Eric Holder had reason to believe Radical Islam played any role at all in the allege terrorist acts, he may not be able to comment about it, baring a national security threat; because, he may be the prosecutor when the case come to trail. Regards, LelandJ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
