On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Jean Laeremans > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I was wondering why they didn't shoot Napalm at the surface to hit a >>> large area at once. I mean strafe the slick day and night increasing >>> the strike zone over time. >> >> Ah that's more like it...the American way... if in doubt bomb it. > ------------------------- > > What you had family in Tokyo ? Bad Steve! > > In a sense of burning this volume what would do? Put a destroyer in > there with a flame thrower behind and drive like hell? Current size > of the slick is the combination of Belgium and the Netherlands in sq > km. > > Europe can thank us for the fabulous sunsets later.
Impossible i guess...by now the problem is far too complex for us. All we can do is...ask The ED. A+ jml _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
