I'm thinking if you print checks in draft, if they are too light to read, you 
can save money with un-cashed checks.  

--- On Wed, 4/7/10, Vincent Teachout <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Vincent Teachout <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NF] bulk processing of documents to change fonts
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 1:27 PM
> 
> > I tried that at home and it looked like crap. 
> The gray scale was
> > probably around a .7 (pure white = 1 and black = 0)
> > 
> > Or it was so light that you squinted to see the actual
> print.
> 
> 
> Different printers use different settings.  I have a
> Brother MC465CN, 
> and it has a range of 4 or 5 settings.  Draft is the
> lowest, which I 
> find hard to read.  I find "Fast Normal", which is a
> notch below normal 
> to be acceptable to read, and still saves ink. 
> YPMV.  (Your printer may 
> vary)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message: 
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> 

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to