To say the notion of right to wrong is a continuum is a truism. I don't see the point of debating that.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [OT] The Fallacy of Gray > On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote: > >> Doesn't look to me like you ever took a course in experimental design and >> measurement. > > > Ah! I knew that my Six Sigma green belt would come in handy some day! > > Yes, you can say what the correct value of something is, based on > statistical analysis, and you can also state the precision of that value. > Refining your test can produce results with less statistical variance, > which allows for a more precise knowledge of the true value. > > You can make similar inferences with life experiences that do not lend > themselves to statistical analysis, and the more experience you have, the > better your understanding of the truth. > > But let's get back to the original topic: the notion that since there > isn't an absolute right or wrong, everything is equivalent, as they are > all 'gray'. It's a continuum, and it is possible to be closer or further > from the truth. > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/fefb3ccc980a425b9b39d6bf73c6a...@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
