Jarvis, Matthew wrote: > I am being told (I am dubious though) that Firebird bogs down at around > 15 users, and anything more than that should be a SQL Server > implementation. > > I realize that there's a big difference between "15 users" and "15 > concurrent users" i.e. who is hitting the DB and when - but are there > any limitations like this that you know of?
If they're open to the idea of Firebird (open source db iirc?), then I think they'd consider MySQL or PostgreSQL as the next alternative before SQL Server? -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
