2009/12/3 Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]>:
> Minimus Dickus wrote:
>> 2009/12/3 Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Publius Maximus wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think he needs more rich white super models who want to bang him for
>>>> his celebrity.
>>>>
>>>> He clearly doesn't have enough of those.
>>>>
>>>> - Publius
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Mmmmm..... lets see.
>>> Wouldn't white super models be enough? Do they have to be rich?
>>> Wouldn't super models be enough? Do they have to be rich? Or is it your
>>> racism showing?
>>>
>>> If YOU had his fame, would you need rich white super models to bang you
>>> for your celebrity? What does that tell us about you and your image of
>>> your world?
>>>
>>
>> Vaska Lecter:
>>
>> OK, now you are living in unreality. Or, can you prove that any of
>> Woods' known mattress buffers is NOT:
>>
>> - Rich
>> - White
>> - A super model
>>
>> As for me, I would not be partial with respect to the race of rich
>> super models wanting to bang me.
> I wouldn't have noticed if they were white black blondes brunettes red
> headed etc. But maybe I live in a different world from yours.
>
>>  But for some reason Woods avoids
>> black ones... Who's the racist?
>>
> Maybe he never noticed. In that case YOU would be the racist (you
> noticed, ergo you pay attention to such things).

So are all the liberals who "notice" that Obama is the "first black
president," which technically is only half true, stealing the vaunted
title from a far more deserving, albeit pasty white-legged, Bill
Clinton. I mean, Maya Angelou (I believe) bestowed that title on the
Slickster, and now what?

- Publius

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to