On 11/22/2009 02:00 PM, Publius Maximus wrote: >>>> >>>> 3) The neoconservative who are motivated to protect the >>>> intestine of Israel and her people. >>> >>> I know no one who cares about Israel's intestines. I'm not even sure >>> what it would mean, if they did... LMAO! >> >> Look no further than the Bush Administration of know what >> the neoconservative influence in government means. The Bush >> Administration was inundated by neoconservatives. > > Whew. For a moment I was afraid you were accusing "neocons" of forcing > every restaurant in America to offer kosher menu items... > >> >>> >>> Your mind is this horrible fusion of cliches, fantasies and outright >>> falsehoods, all unnaturally blended together like the body parts of >>> three different species of fauna forced through a juicer. >> >> So, you think I'm the blob. LOL >> >> http://blog.mycology.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/the-blob-eats-a-jock.jpg > > I think you mind is more inert than the blob.
Has this thread already degraded to nothing more than a bunch of insults? > > >>> I've never been in a cup with any other Republican, and would rather >>> be shot in the back of the head, frankly. >> >> Whoops, I meant "coupling of the Religious Righters, >> corporations and the wealthy, and Neoconservative". >> > > I don't couple with other Republicans (well, besides my wife), either... I think the use of "coupling" in my post was OK: [1913 Webster] 1. To link or tie, as one thing to another; to connect or fasten together; to join. [1913 Webster] > >> >>> I'm sure more than one of >>> your Dear Leader's Mao-quoting "czars" is working feverishly to make >>> that possible. >> >> I'm so glad to be an American living in the USA, that is >> governed by a constitution and bill of rights. > > Enjoy it while it lasts. > >> >> The constitution and bill of rights guarantees me basic >> rights like freedom of religion, freedom of speech, rights >> to due process, rights to privacy, and the right to elect >> official who will represent me. President Obama is a strong >> believer in our constitutional system of government, rule of >> law, and justice system. > > Sigh. This is one of those moments when I ask myself, "Should I try > again? Will this fact penetrate his thick skull, or just return void > once more?" > > Alas, my Christian duty is to try: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11OhmY1obS4&feature=video_response The youtube video show a series of photos of President Obama with a narrative that is suggestive that President Obama is speaking, which is suspicious to me. Also, it never indicated the flaw in the constitution to which the narrative refers, which should have been the main point of the narrative. Weird. > >> As long as Americas insure the >> constitution remains the highest law of the land, there is >> little to fear from tyranny. > > Which is why I'm terrified. Or do you not know that Obama is all for > the Copenhagen treaty in principle, which would create a world > government, i.e., a "law of the land" higher than the Constitution? That's not going to happen. A new world order that trumps The American constitution in the USA would never succeed, unless our country was occupied and under the rule of foreign forces, but then there would emerge a USA resistance. I'm not familiar with Obama thinking on the Copenhagen treaty, so I'll have to do some research on that. Regards, LelandJ Regards, LelandJ > > - Publius > >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
