At 05:20 2009-10-13, Bob Calco <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > At 15:58 2009-10-12, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >It's amazing that skilled programmers can't set filters.
> >
> > Actually, it is very easy. The problem is that some of the
> > [OT] material is of interest. That is why I suggested that Ed create
> > a [USP] tag for U.S. politics.
>
>I don't mind voluntarily appending [USP] to [OT] whenever it's only about US
>Politics, for those people closed-minded enough to want to filter that out.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Try the word "uninterested".
[snip]
>We all love freedom of speech until someone speaks freely, or "our side" is
>in power. Then we act like merely penning a zinger is a crime against the
>state---too horrible for innocent eyes to behold. Oh help us, benevolent
>Nanny State! Protect me from these awful words!
Not true for me. I am not really too concerned about the
views, but the flaming is very tiring. Can you (speaking in general
to the list) state your views politely and argue against other
persons' views politely? If you can, please do so. If you can not, why not?
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
