Paul McNett wrote: > Allen wrote: > > Behalf Of Paul McNett >>> Although an army of compromised Linux machines would have much more powerful >>> and >>> capable tools at their disposal. >> They are all pc's so what's the difference? Windows or Linux compromised is >> a bad thing. I think sometimes the want to hate Microsoft makes the >> headsoft. > > All I meant to say is that most Linux distros come with hundreds of > command-line > tools to analyze, send, modify network packets, running programs, etc. These > tools > could be used by a successful Linux exploit, simplifying the ability to cause > damage. > > Windows doesn't come with such easy-to-use, powerful tools.
Also, I don't want to hate Microsoft. I simply choose to use tools from developers that I trust, and try to show people that they really aren't locked in, even if they feel they are. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
