Good Evening: Thanks for your suggestion. I will look at table buffering. Have a great weekend. Regards,
Jack Skelley ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of KAM.covad [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 4:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VFP8: Record Lock Same here. We are using VFP9 SP1. ----- Original Message ----- From: Frank Cazabon To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 1:19 PM Subject: Re: VFP8: Record Lock Hi Jack, Jack Skelley wrote: > I have read the help screens for a multiuser app and still not able not allow > an edit on the second instance of the app. > Can someone point me to where I read about how to do this? > You could look at setting the buffering of the table to 4 (pessimistic). Check the help on CURSORSETPROP(). FWIW I never lock a record any more. I always use optimistic table buffering. -- Frank. Frank Cazabon Samaan Systems Ltd. - Developing Solutions www.SamaanSystems.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b6603838655b5...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
