On Apr 16, 2009, at 11:10 AM, [email protected] wrote: > (yipee! new term, suckidity index... I should try to patent that)
I think another "feature" you can add to that index is all of the "Re:'s" your on-line client is adding. In the other thread in which you have been participating: what are we up to 7? "Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:..." What the heck, let's go for a new record: 2,637 Re:'s ! Ken _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1d925670-8c15-4d9f-9fe9-a033037cd...@information-architecture.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
