Thanks Mike, that's exactly how I see it. *************************************************
--- On Mon, 2/23/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 5:22 PM > Well however they determined that some were underpaid, and > if they legitamantly where then it could be said that they > "deserve" and should get more money. Those that > got overpaid, no one has said by how much, which would be > interesting to know. And second, they cashed the check and > microsoft sent the check and allowed it to be cashed. They > should be allowed to keep the money as technically they both > made a deal and both parties accepted it. And from what i > could gather from the articles microsoft is > "asking" for the money back, not > "demandinga" which leads me to believe that there > is little legal action they could do to get the money back. > > Just my 10 cents > > Mike > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sytze de Boer <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:07:43 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back > > > Then I must be an idiot. > Mistakes happen. Are you saying the ones who were underpaid > (and who are > asking for an adjustment) are also idiots? > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Michael Madigan > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Only an idiot would send them back their money. > > > > ************************************************* > > 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice > > > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 > > > > > > --- On Mon, 2/23/09, MB Software Solutions General > Account < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > From: MB Software Solutions General Account < > > [email protected]> > > > Subject: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back > > > To: [email protected] > > > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 3:57 PM > > > Sad, but true: > > > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,498666,00.html > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Post Messages to: [email protected] > > > Subscription Maintenance: > > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > > > OT-free version of this list: > > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > > > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > > > This message: > > > > > > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated > otherwise, are > > > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute > legal or > > > medical advice. This statement is added to the > messages for > > > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the > obvious. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
