Perhaps it is because I come from a country where over recent decades we put
in place a set of responsible financial regulations and are currently
reaping the rewards for it. While your financial system is needing massive
support just to stay afloat we are having zero problems. In fact, the only
economic problems we are facing (which are still large) are as a result of
other countries massive recessions (reduced trade, exchange rates, credit
issues etc).

You see, we LIVE what I'm talking about and it is a good place to be. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bob Calco
Sent: Monday, 16 February 2009 11:53 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Federal Obligations Exceed World GDP

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Bob Calco <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Why you believe government regulators are exempt from human nature,
> I'd like
> > to hear.
> >
> Why do you confuse regulator with regulations ?

I don't. But the regulations can't be good if the regulators who create them
are bad.

Geoff seems to think regulations grow on trees and always bare good fruit,
and there is something unnatural about being averse to regulations per se.
I'm trying to clarify that I am fine with sensible regulations as long as
the regulators are also regulated.

I don't assume their motives are any purer than those of the execs he seems
to convict of perfidy by definition.

- Bob


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to