On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Bob Calco <[email protected]> wrote: >> This will be seen within the next 150 years or 15,000? Purely a >> mathematical answer you promote. > > I don't promote anything---just found somebody who knows what they're > talking about about climate change, who doesn't buy into the "indisputable > truth" of global warming. ---------------------------------------------------
Bob what I read in the article you presented was as accurate as say the daily horoscope. This is cyclical just as power of governments rises and falls so do does the concept of a warming trend or a cooling trend. The whole idea that one group is correct and the other is faking their results reminds me of the stupidity that went into last years political exercise. One set of polls says this and the others set of polls says that. When your group is buying/funding/paying for the outcome that justifies their respective position can anyone take the results as accurate? I try to see both sides of the story and neither is accurate. Both seem to be in a complete opposite vision of the others. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
