Paul McNett wrote: > Stephen Russell wrote: >> Why not go with GUID and then it is an easy .New() whenever you need it? > > That's right: keep it on the client. > > >> Only downside with GUID is index bloat and repagination as necessary. > > GUID's are larger, but I really don't think they'll cause practical problems being > larger.
Especially with robust database servers I would hope. Perhaps GUIDs with a local VFP database and then "replicate" of sorts with a more industrial strength database on the web (e.g., MySQL). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
