Rick Schummer wrote: >>> All feedback on this topic welcome and appreciated-<< > > Runtime files are named identical for a major release of VFP, so your SP1 and SP2 runtimes are > identically named. No way around that. > > I agree with Paul and Andrew in this situation about putting the runtimes in the folder with your > executable. This way you can test appropriately the executable and the runtimes together. You do not > need to register the VFP runtimes if you take this approach. The same cannot be said however for the > Help file runtimes. These have to be registered, but those files were not changed in SP2 so there is > no additional risk.
Besides, disk space is cheap so there's no need to rely on the old approach of having it exist in one spot and using the registry for that reference. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
