Stephen Russell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:09 AM, MB Software Solutions General > Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Andrew Stirling wrote: >>> also re Servoy. >>> >>> "Concurrent user licensing: >>> For each client connected to Servoy Server, you need one Servoy Client >>> license. For example: Suppose you have an application that is used by >>> 2,000 users on 1,800 computers, and at the busiest time 300 users are >>> connected to the server at the same time. You need only 300 Servoy >>> Client licenses. Prices are listed in our online store. You can purchase >>> licenses from our distributors, partners, developers or through our >>> online store. " The cost of 300 is not available!!! >>> >>> prices= 100 licenses = $27000.00 with a a subscription of $7000.00 >>> >>> Now lets have a think, a 100 FoxPro Licence ( we will use Proper >>> English) costs 0.00. >>> >>> That might defray the annual cost somewhat. Might even cover the upfront >>> costs. ( apart from Stephen, of course.) >> >> But the TCO includes both the development time as well as the licensing >> costs, so is DotNet perhaps the winner if a non-costing backend like VFP >> is used? Most would not use VFP for the backend in that situation, so >> let's assume PostgreSQL or SQL-Server-Express. Who's the winner then? > ------------------------------------------- > > The winner is the one that gets the SW to perform the tasks they want > without errors, and without a terrible pain to accomplish the end > goal. > > The only winner is the one that is happy in the end. Everyone else is > a loser or casualtity in the game. > > It may have been the Indian consulting firm?? They did they stuff, no > bugs got logged they got paid. >
Yes, of course, but that's obvious....ASSUMING THEY BOTH WORK, STEPHEN, what's your answer then? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
