Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jul 23, 2008, at 3:36 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account > wrote: > >> Right....and for the purposes you mentioned (cloud, etc.) it should be >> perfect. My question is that the stuff introduced in MySQL5 (Stored >> procs, triggers, etc.), did that *really* make it less attractive >> (speed-wise) for some folks? I guess so, otherwise, why make this >> product? > > > Because raw speed isn't the only criterion used to select a database. > Being able to meet a feature requirement checklist matters a lot to > some people.
I don't think I explained myself correctly given your answer. My thought was that if they want something like MySQL 3.23 for its speed if tons faster, ok, but other than that, what would Drizzle have that MySQL5 doesn't already do? Sure it doesn't have those things, but are those things causing unnecessary overhead? Does that make sense now as to my question? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
