Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > Yeah, but look at some of the alternatives: > > 1) autocracy. > 2) theocracy. > 3) a Microsoft like monopoly/dictatorship <g>. > 4) a benevolent dictatorship. > 5) etc, etc, as there are many possibilities along a continuum. > > As for me, I will take a two or more party democracy any day over the > alternatives.
Why not just have the guy who gets the most votes be the Prez, and the runner up is the VP? Yeah, I know...there'd be more assassinations that way. ;-) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
