Michael said that it was a Muslim, I said that there was no proof in the
article that it was a Muslim. 

Either show me in the article where it says that the murderer was a
Muslim or accept that Michael is wrong in his statement.

Simple straight forward question, no prejudices please.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pete Theisen
Sent: 14 April 2008 12:59
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Bride for Peace raped and murdered by Muslim in Turkey

On Monday 14 April 2008 05:31, Adam Buckland wrote:

> Where is the prejudice in my statement?

Hi Adam!

Your prejudice is in your conclusion that a one percent chance of
something 
else means that it is likely enough to be something else that you should

accuse Michael of making up facts, You could have waited a day or so and
had 
some basis for your accusation, or not, but that isn't your style.

Neither of you KNOW from the article, but both of you appear to have 
concluded.

> On Monday 14 April 2008 04:28, Adam Buckland wrote:
> > Once again Michael makes up the facts to suit his prejudices, the
> > article doesn't actually say that it was a Muslim who murdered her.
> > Whilst the majority are,  not all Turks are Muslim.

> By Achmed, you're right! How could Michael fail to follow YOUR
> prejudice, rather than his own? Not allowing for a whole 1%!!!
>
> "Nominally, 99% of the Turkish population is Muslim
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to