Weather records have been maintained for only a couple of 1 or 2 hundred years out of a planetary history of billions of years, so it is almost a certainty that summer and winter records will be broken somewhere around the world. I wounder what extremes would be reveled had weather records been available over the entire history of our planet?
The fact of the effects the arctic, antarctic, and glaciers are melting is well documented. Aerial photos and maps clearly show the amount of mass covered by ice in the arctic and antarctic circles and the size of glaciers thirty year ago as compared to today. What has not been definitively found is the cause of the changes. If the cause is not global warming nor cyclical warming and cooling, then please explain the cause of the rapid melting of some regions of earth. Regards, LelandJ Michael Madigan wrote: > This year, however, North America had one of the > snowiest years on record. Michigan broke records > dating back to the 1880s. > > Additionally, the polar icecaps have added much of the > ice supposedly lost. > > There needs to be a special proscecutor appointed to > see if Al Gore broke any laws. > > > > --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> The article indicated the earth had been in a >> cooling cycle for the past >> 10 years, yet during this same period glaciers and >> the ice sheets of the >> north and south poles have decreased significantly >> form meltdowns. The >> formation of the glaciers and building of the ice >> sheets in the arctic >> and antarctic circles of earth took hundreds of >> thousand, even millions >> of years to occur, yet they have melted >> significantly over the past >> twenty to thirty years, and seem to be melting at an >> exponential rate. >> >> These meltdowns are occurring to rapidly to fit >> normal warming and >> cooling cycles. The ice is melting almost as if it >> has been microwaved >> from the inside out, or at least evenly throughout >> ice deeps of miles. >> Historic warming and cooling cycles do not explain >> the sudden and rapid >> melting of ice occurring today, which is >> historically unprecedented. >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> Michael Madigan wrote: >> >>> Climate changes is caused by the sun. Solar >>> >> activity >> >>> runs in cycles. Solar activity reached a peak, >>> >> now we >> >>> will see years of cooling. Only Al Gore has to >>> >> worry >> >>> we're he's going to steal his next million from. >>> >>> >>> >>> --- "Leland F. Jackson, CPA" >>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> If CO2 is not causing global warming, and the >>>> climate is in fact >>>> cooling; rather than spending time and money on >>>> congressional hearing, >>>> it would be better to find the cause/effect >>>> relationship as to why our >>>> glaciers are melting, and the environments in the >>>> colder regions of >>>> planet earth, like the north and south poles, are >>>> changing. The effects >>>> that something is going terribly wrong can be >>>> >> seen >> >>>> everywhere, and we >>>> best get busy and find the cause of it, so as to >>>> address the problem, if >>>> in fact, it is something that could be controlled >>>> >> by >> >>>> human intervention. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> LelandJ >>>> >>>> >>>> Michael Madigan wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> There now needs to be a congressional hearings >>>>> >> on >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> who >>>> >>>> >>>>> is making money on this total scam and have any >>>>> >>>>> >>>> laws >>>> >>>> >>>>> been broken. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html > >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Duffy: "The climate is actually, in one way >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> anyway, >>>> >>>> >>>>>> more robust than was >>>>>> assumed in the climate models?" >>>>>> >>>>>> Marohasy: "That's right ... These findings >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> actually >>>> >>>> >>>>>> aren't being disputed by >>>>>> the meteorological community. They're having >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> trouble >>>> >>>> >>>>>> digesting the findings, >>>>>> they're acknowledging the findings, they're >>>>>> acknowledging that the data from >>>>>> NASA's Aqua satellite is not how the models >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> predict, >>>> >>>> >>>>>> and I think they're >>>>>> about to recognise that the models really do >>>>>> >> need >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>> >>>>>> be overhauled and that >>>>>> when they are overhauled they will probably >>>>>> >> show >> >>>>>> greatly reduced future >>>>>> warming projected as a consequence of carbon >>>>>> dioxide." >>>>>> >>>>>> Duffy: "From what you're saying, it sounds like >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>> >>>>>> implications of this >>>>>> could be considerable ..." >>>>>> >>>>>> Marohasy: "That's right, very much so. The >>>>>> >> policy >> >>>>>> implications are enormous. >>>>>> The meteorological community at the moment is >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> really >>>> >>>> >>>>>> just coming to terms >>>>>> with the output from this NASA Aqua satellite >>>>>> >> and >> >>>>>> (climate scientist) Roy >>>>>> Spencer's interpretation of them. His work is >>>>>> published, his work is >>>>>> accepted, but I think people are still in shock >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> at >>>> >>>> >>>>>> this point." >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>> A great many founts of authority, from the >>>>>> >> Royal >> >>>>>> Society to the UN, most >>>>>> heads of government along with countless >>>>>> >> captains >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> of >>>> >>>> >>>>>> industry, learned >>>>>> professors, commentators and journalists will >>>>>> >> be >> >>>>>> profoundly embarrassed. Let >>>>>> us hope it is a prolonged and chastening >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> experience. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> With catastrophe off the agenda, for most >>>>>> >> people >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>> >>>>>> fog of millennial gloom >>>>>> will lift, at least until attention turns to >>>>>> >> the >> >>>>>> prospect of the next ice >>>>>> age. Among the better educated, the sceptical >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> cast >>>> >>>> >>>>>> of mind that is the basis >>>>>> of empiricism will once again be back in >>>>>> >> fashion. >> >>>>>> The delusion that by >>>>>> recycling and catching public transport we can >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> help >>>> >>>> >>>>>> save the planet will >>>>>> quickly come to be seen for the childish >>>>>> >> nonsense >> >> > === message truncated === > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
