Strange;  the Bush Administration in its support of Pervez Musarraf 
stands in the way of a Pakistan that is more centrist and democratic.

#--------------------------------------------


  A New Pakistan


    Agreement on a more democratic system is close, but Pervez Musharraf
    must let it happen.


Sunday, March 16, 2008; Page B06

PAKISTAN IS on the verge of taking a major step toward consolidating a 
centrist, secular democracy -- the best antidote to the Islamist 
extremism threatening the country. The crucial remaining question is 
whether President Pervez Musharraf 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Pervez+Musharraf?tid=informline>,
 
and his allies in the Bush administration, will allow it to happen.

The potential breakthrough comes in the agreement of the two largest 
political parties, the Pakistan People's Party 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Pakistan+Peoples+Party?tid=informline>
 
and the Muslim League, to form a coalition government that will hold a 
commanding majority in the Parliament elected last month. People's Party 
leader Asif Ali Zadari, the widower of assassinated former prime 
minister Benazir Bhutto 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Benazir+Bhutto?tid=informline>,
 
and Muslim League chief Nawaz Sharif 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Nawaz+Sharif?tid=informline>, 
also a former prime minister, agreed to implement a Charter for 
Democracy that Ms. Bhutto and Mr. Sharif hammered out in 2006 while they 
were living in exile. They plan to reform the constitution to eliminate 
autocratic powers accumulated by Mr. Musharraf following his 1999 coup 
against a democratic government, including the right to name commanders 
of the armed forces.

Even more important, the new government plans to restore the 63 senior 
judges -- including members of the Supreme Court -- illegally fired by 
Mr. Musharraf in November in a second coup intended to ensure himself 
another term as president. The defense of the dismissed judges, some of 
whom are still under house arrest, and the larger cause of building a 
genuinely independent judiciary have become the country's most popular 
political movement. When they are restored to the bench and controls 
imposed by Mr. Musharraf on the media are removed, Pakistan 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Pakistan?tid=informline> 
could have the most liberal and open political system in its history. 
That is the long-term solution to the assault on the country by the 
Taliban 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/The+Taliban?tid=informline>, 
al-Qaeda 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Al+Qaeda?tid=informline> 
and other Islamist fanatics, who so far this year have carried out 16 
suicide bombings and killed more than 500 people -- making Pakistan 
almost as violent as Iraq 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Iraq?tid=informline>.

The last obstacle is Mr. Musharraf himself, who has clung to the office 
of president despite the overwhelming repudiation of his party in last 
month's elections. Retired from the Army, Mr. Musharraf has one last 
base of support is the Bush administration, which stubbornly continues 
to back him. Fearful of what a restored Supreme Court might rule about 
his clearly illegitimate presidential mandate, the president is still 
trying to strike a deal to remain in office. If he doesn't get his way, 
he could refuse to recognize Parliament's authority or try to dissolve 
it after it convenes this week.

In short, only the personal ambitions of Mr. Musharraf, and the Bush 
administration's support for them, threaten to disrupt the establishment 
of a more democratic Pakistan. President Bush 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/George+W.+Bush?tid=informline>,
 
who claims to believe that the replacement of autocrats with secular 
democratic governments is a key U.S. interest, should act on his own 
principle. He should tell Mr. Musharraf either to accept the decisions 
of the new government and courts, or step down.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/15/AR2008031502029.html?wpisrc=newsletter

or

http://tinyurl.com/3bj5kl

#-----------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to