If nuking 80,000 Japanese saved a single American
life, then it was well worth it.


--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
> > Then you'll like this document: 
>
http://www.umich.edu/~historyj/pages_folder/articles/Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki.pdf
> 
> > 
> 
> Interesting read. However it does not address the
> point I'm making. How
> many saved US lives do you think would morally
> justify the murder of two
> civilian cities? One, ten, a hundred?
> And how many saved Muslim lives would justify the
> twin towers?
> 
> You know, there were also civilians there.
> To make it simpler, do you wage war on civilians?
> The story of your
> service (USAF) suggests you do, suggests you approve
> burning civilians
> with napalm. But you personally, would you burn a
> baby with napalm? And
> if you had to get out of your plane, near and
> personal, would you put a
> baby in the oven and burn him just because his
> country is at war with you?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to