Jeff. > My 2 cents. I had an opportunity to discuss this very subject with > several people "in the know". It is my understanding that > none of the reasons below were at play. It is my understanding that they > wanted the technology - especially rushmore - and the people. I believe that > rushmore is in SQL Server and possibly other stuff. WE also > know that > there are FoxPro people scattered throughout the company and not in > trivial positions. I personally don't believe for a minute that they > wanted to "kill" FoxPro. You can believe what you want, but > it really doesn't make much difference one way or the other.
I certainly agree that nobody on the Fox team would have made a move to kill it, but *somebody* with the power sure did. No disagreement there, right? Bill > Jeff _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
