[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Err isn't that what the US Military is there for. The right to bear arms was >> only put up when there was no standing military forces in the US. It is out >> of >> date and should be removed. > > You apparently don't understand that we can't always look to the government > for protection... sometimes we need protection FROM the government. > > Wasn't there a recent posting here that told us that the difference between > the US and France was that in France the government feared the people and > here in the US, the people feared the government. >
Well you see, the French 'people' put their aristocracy to the guillotine. So it makes sense that government fears them. On the other hand, US 'people' have never been able to do likewise so it figures it's govt. won't fear them so much. Anyway US govt wants a really tight control over the 'people', just in case, hence you get patriot act. hahahahaha! > Something to think about. > > Larry Miller > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
