Yes, the triggers can be controlled and turned on/off when the SQL solution
has been validated. Removing the VFP specific features leaves the
functionality intact and your conversion is done!

I had just over 1300 programs to convert and test which took about 4 months
once I had defined the logic to apply.

Dave

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 12:47 Chris Davis, <chr...@actongate.co.uk> wrote:

> Please Dave if you don’t mind, I guess that was followed by code changes
> once the .dbf was dropped to update SQL direct?
>
> Regards
>
> Chris.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
> Sent: 18 December 2024 11:58
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Database Migration Pointers
>
> When I had to upsize to M$ SQL I developed a set of triggers that actioned
> the SQL updates as they occurred in the Fox DB files. This meant that I was
> running with two sets of data for ease of use and I gradually dropped the
> .dbf files once the data in SQL DB was confirmed to be correct. It worked
> well with little if no speed penalty. I can dig out the trigger procedures
> if you want.
> Dave
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024, 13:10 Eric Selje, <e...@saltydogllc.com> wrote:
>
> > There's a Hentzenwerke book about upsizing your apps to MySQL. It
> > covers a lot of the little gotchas. If you poke around I bet there's a
> > copy floating around somewhere.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:52 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
> > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Besides what the others said in code and uncoded messages (lol), I
> > > recall having to have the remote views database locally (instead of
> > > a common location on the network) due to VFP locking something which
> > > would cause issues.
> > >
> > > Good luck!
> > > --Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/24/2024 9:42 AM, Chris Davis wrote:
> > > > Hi All
> > > >
> > > > Before we start this just figured it would make sense to reach out
> > > > to
> > > you guys for any general advice or pointers you can give.
> > > >
> > > > We have a typical multiuser VFP application using a DBC with DBF’s
> > > > and
> > > local views.
> > > >
> > > > The forms that interact with this data all have a DE and for the
> > > deployed versions we have DPATHMGR sorting the DE paths out making
> > > everything work.
> > > >
> > > > We have no immediate need to change anything about from front end
> > > > ,
> > it’s
> > > relatively straight forward and most of the code is based around
> > > TABLEUPDATE and TABLEREVERT.
> > > >
> > > > Our mission is just to loose the DBFs and move the data to SQL as
> > > > our
> > > first pass.  No intentions to make use of SQL things like stored
> > procedures
> > > , we just want to treat it as a data dump for the moment.
> > > >
> > > > So after using VFPX/UpsizingWizard our initial thoughts are to
> > > > replace
> > > the local view with remote views and then continue with the current
> > method
> > > of CRUD via the views.
> > > >
> > > > Anything you feel is worth a heads up on for us to consider before
> > > > we
> > > get on with it?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Chris
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CA+=YCLVpB+c+xONDGXBqDw9E628ThGBdm+iL-=iapnuoev-...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to