My OPINION is that it will probably be quicker to try and run it under 9, and do run/crash/fix/repeat until it runs cleanly. My 2 cents.
On Tuesday, December 17th, 2024 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Roberts <jefflrobe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've been asked to help document business logic in an old (even for Visual > Foxpro) app. It appears that it was built using Codemine and VFP5. I've > worked with Foxpro on and off almost all my life, but with the exception of > an old VFP6 that I do very little ongoing maintenance on, my Foxpro is > getting pretty rusty! I think they have all the source files, including > Codemine, but it seems to be looking for classes and other files that > shipped with VFP5, and it doesn't see the Codemine files. > > I plan to either try to locate a full copy of VFP5 or try to get it to work > with my existing copy of VFP9, then try to add the places it may need to > look for things into the path. Am I missing anything? Is it worth tracking > down a copy of VFP5 or do you guys think it will find the updated > components in a VFP9 install? Many thanks in advance for any tips! > > -- > Jeff Roberts | jefflrobe...@gmail.com > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/mjrcvQdLdhqXy39blVFWMFC8EzXh3-ZMXaH1eJuT3qwBefldmv7hTU-pyh9hnmwWQp21k0Kx1zTMD8_v842JaN77uRlnwQJLFJBvXgaVnaU=@caracal.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
