On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, at 2:37 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > I've always suspected that Microsoft adopted this approach not because > it was useful to users, but because it bloated the storage requirements > for a business running Exchange, forcing companies to pay lots more > money for storage.
I certainly fail to see who is benefiting from the new Outlook (i.e. the web application in a container) other than the Azure division's bean counters. Fine, as a replacement for the default simple Windows mail application - but as a replacement for the full fat desktop client, I just don't get it. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/e79f3de0-3386-4bfb-ba78-882c7b1a9...@app.fastmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
