That was the 30,000 for view, of course. 😊

Gotta get your head wrapped around the requirements of the API you’re calling. 
What I’m referring to is the architecture of the internal APIs written by my 
engineering team here. There are a couple of different flavors and the token 
handling isn’t consistent between the two. I really did find that going through 
Rick’s tutorials were very helpful since it’s got the VFP perspective.

--

rk

From: ProfoxTech <profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com> On Behalf Of Paul H. Tarver
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 11:19 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Need Help - Foxpro & Chilkat & Rest API

I wish it was as easy to program as it was to read your explanation! :)

But I guess if it were really easy, then everyone would be learning to code.
:)

Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Kaye
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 9:20 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com<mailto:profoxt...@leafe.com>
Subject: RE: Need Help - Foxpro & Chilkat & Rest API

Generally speaking, the token is the key that unlocks access to the APIs you
want to call. So you need to persist that in your business object, and pass
it to any API calls you make. Depending on the API you're hitting, the token
value could be in the request header or it could be a key:value pair in the
payload.

--

rk

From: ProfoxTech 
<profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com<mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com>> On Behalf 
Of Paul H. Tarver
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 9:38 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com<mailto:profoxt...@leafe.com>
Subject: RE: Need Help - Foxpro & Chilkat & Rest API

Definitely!

I did have a small breakthrough yesterday as I was able to get an OAuth2
Token returned from within VFP. Woohoo!

Now if I can just figure out what to do with it. :)

Paul H. Tarver
Tarver Program Consultants, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 4:54 PM
To: 
profoxt...@leafe.com<mailto:profoxt...@leafe.com<mailto:profoxt...@leafe.com%3cmailto:profoxt...@leafe.com>>
Subject: Re: Need Help - Foxpro & Chilkat & Rest API

On Jul 11, 2022, at 16:51, Paul H. Tarver
<p...@tpcqpc.com<mailto:p...@tpcqpc.com<mailto:p...@tpcqpc.com%3cmailto:p...@tpcqpc.com>>>
 wrote:
>
> I'll keep looking for your project and when you release it, I'll definite
> consider upgrading to your tool as soon as I can.

Sounds like a potential beta tester! ;-)

-- Ed Leafe







[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com<mailto:ProFox@leafe.com>
Subscription Maintenance: 
https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/E5mfCERZ20IBYvmcZv6_E?domain=mail.leafe.com>
OT-free version of this list: 
https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/yYx2CG6Y2Mhw6DmI0qy2F?domain=mail.leafe.com>
Searchable Archive: 
https://leafe.com/archives<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/DNBrCJ6Y2NhxV6RSpkpeI?domain=leafe.com>
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/062301d89602$bbdb1db0$33915910$@tpcqpc.com<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/tAJxCKrY2LTL6XlFnW-sD?domain=leafe.com>
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/mn2pr10mb3407149466568069d2efc18fd2...@mn2pr10mb3407.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to