Hi Alan, > If you make these changes you are removing all the performance benefits of > SMB3 for *all* applications on workstations and server, including file > copying etc.
Yes, that's true. It's a matter of priorities, I'd say: You can have correct data, or you can get data fast. We recommend terminal services with data stored locally on the terminal server or remotely on an iSCSI storage. For extra redundancy we recommend using terminal server in a virtual environment with redundant servers and redundant storage. But usually that advice is being ignored. <shrug> -- Christof _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/58fb0d64-7b37-4dc1-bfe1-f3d8b8583...@wollenhaupt.org ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
