I've never doubted the benefits of stored procedures and if I were an
in-house programmer for a company with full admin rights and/or console
access to the SQL Servers, I would be tempted to always use stored
procedures myself. However, that is NOT the world I work in. My job is to
build interfaces to move data between different systems. I am usually
provided with READ-ONLY SQL credentials so I can then issue SELECT queries
to extract data and then use the results of those queries to create data
feeds into other systems.
Our systems pull data in one direction only and when I describe dynamic SQL
statements I'm referring to something little like this (although most are
far more complicated queries with lots of moving parts):
lcWhereClause = "WHERE emp.CpnyID = '" +
ALLTRIM(thisform.CoCode.value)
TEXT TO lcSQLCmd TEXTMERGE NOSHOW
SELECT
CAST(emp.CpnyID AS CHAR(20)) AS compid,
CAST(emp.EmpId AS CHAR(20)) AS emplid,
emp.NameFirst as fname,
emp.NameMiddle as mname,
emp.NameLast as lname,
emp.StrtDate as hire_date
FROM dbo.Employee emp
<<lcWhereClause>>
ENDTEXT
lnStatus = SQLEXEC(lnSQLHandle, lcSQLCmd, "EmpList")
We accept and validate the selection of the CoCode by the user and then we
construct the "dynamic query." I suspect your perception of a Dynamic Query
is greatly different than mine. The point of my original comment was to
praise the ease with which I can construct SQL statements in a TEXT/ENDTEXT
construct and I think this example shows that
Thanks!
Paul H. Tarver
-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen
Russell
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 9:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NF] What would you miss from VFP, when migrating
I am backing off of licenses for SQL Enterprise down to Standard for 2/3 of
all my SQL Server usage in my new deployments. Use to have a total of 96
cores running Ent. and now seeing if we can only use 30. Having virtual
guests instead of a single bad ass box makes this a lot easier to do.
Dynamic SQL can burn you.
https://www.cnet.com/news/sony-playstation-site-victim-of-sql-injection-atta
ck/
Making a stored procedure is common sense. Why you cannot see the beauty
of it for long term source code is lost on me. Say you make a change to a
table. You can easily find every sproc that referenced that table with
this statement and miss all that you have fixed:
declare @text varchar(50)
, @stringtosearch varchar(100)
, @comment varchar(150)
set @text = 'Warehouse'
set @comment ='%WarehouseChange fixed%'
SET @stringtosearch = '%' +@text + '%'
SELECT Distinct SO.Name
FROM sysobjects SO (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN syscomments SC (NOLOCK) on SO.Id = SC.ID
AND SO.Type = 'P'
AND SC.Text LIKE @stringtosearch
and SO.id not in
(select distinct SO1.ID
FROM sysobjects SO1 (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN syscomments SC1 (NOLOCK) on SO1.Id = SC1.ID
AND SO1.Type = 'P'
AND SC1.Text LIKE @comment)
ORDER BY SO.Name
You can then cross reference every place that the table was used and see if
you need to tweak the data access to include the change you just made to
the column.
We just got handed an oh by the way that hits a major focus on how we track
sales. We use to give all sales to the plant that made them, which makes
sense. Over time we have created warehouses in areas of the country to hold
product for delivery to a customer rich area. Sure the ERP already did
this but the early reporting team never saw that value.
All of these changes are only in our BI/reporting system or our customer
portal. We have to identify over 1000 sprocs to validate that nothing
needs to be done here and only 150 really need to be altered.
How would you find that in your prgs? I use the power of the db engine
to do a lot of things like this for me.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:16 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6/27/2019 6:39 PM, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> > Give me a little credit for being a better programmer than that.
>
>
> C'mon, Paul -- it's mega-million$ $teve we're talking about here. Mr.
> Deep Pockets with SQL Server blinders on usually with only Stored
> Procedures being the only viable safe option.
>
> lol
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message:
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
