On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, at 4:00 PM, Chris Davis wrote:
> So possibly if a VFP9 app was installed, and then a VFP7 app was 
> installed after it some older files might get replaced which could 
> generate a class not found in the VFP9 app ?  Sound reasonable?

Don't think so because the VFP runtimes have different names - VFP9R.DLL, 
VFP8R.DLL and so on.

More likely an EXE or APP built with VFP9 that you are trying to execute under 
an earlier version.

-- 
  Alan Bourke
  alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1525101639.3453128.1355707832.01376...@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to