I was just about to post a follow up note for the group because once I started testing with changing the default PacketSize, I realized that it wasn't changing no matter what I did.
In response to your comments regarding optimizing the queries, I think I should clarify that what I'm interested in speeding is up isn't the query itself, but rather the transfer of data from the server to my local instance of VFP. I am under the impression I will get a bit of a boost once I move my development off the VPN to a full internal network connection, but I guess I'm greedy enough to think perhaps I can squeeze just a few more milliseconds out of the data transfer process since with 30 separate databases to query the transfer time is taking up a significant portion of my total processing time. The Fox has never let me down, so I just figured I would go back to the well one more time! :) Paul -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 2:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Tuning VFP SQL Pass-Through For Fastest Times Transferring Query Results I was trying to play with packet size recently and it appears that the current versions of the SQL ODBC driver have deprecated this parameter. At least my attempts to change were met with failure. I think the best opportunity for optimization would be to create your queries as stored procedures and then call the stored procs. This will allow SQL to generate execution plans that can be reused. This also assumes your queries are written in a way that allows you to pass parameters to the SPs. -- rk -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul H. Tarver Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 2:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Tuning VFP SQL Pass-Through For Fastest Times Transferring Query Results I'm working on a project which involves issuing multiple queries across several SQL databases and servers. At this point, I'm polling about 30 databases and retrieving data from four tables from each database. I really have no reason to complain as my procedure including retrieving the data synchronously over a VPN, processing results locally and then exporting the data to local files only takes about 6 minutes. However, I see this as an opportunity to tune my sql back-end connection and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions say for setting the PacketSize or other changes that might optimize the retrieval of data from the server(s). Thanks in advance! Paul --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
