Thanks w00dy,
As usual an excellent answer to many questions that lots of VFPers will have

Dave



---------------------------------------------------------------
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person 
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential and may 
be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not 
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use, 
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.

Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the 
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via 
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to 
run your own virus check before opening any
attachments received as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any 
liability whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received.

It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate 
virus protection.

Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
Unit 14 Bentwood Road
Carrs
Industrial Estate
Haslingden
Rossendale
Lancashire
BB4 5HH

Tel:01706-222792
Fax: 01706-224683
www.Flexipol.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------

Terms & Conditions:

Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in 
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds 
payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold 
by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as 
the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods 
as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from 
those of the buyer and third parties and properly stored protected and insured 
and identified as the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use 
the goods in the ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the 
property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any 
time

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jürgen Wondzinski
Sent: 31 October 2017 12:29
To: 'ProFox Email List' <[email protected]>
Subject: AW: VFP10 Advanced was FoxPro DevCon in Frankfurt

Basically, the moniker "VFPA" is three things:

a) the regular 32Bit VFP9 enginge, patched with 30+ bugfixes
b) same as a), but with a 64bit engine
c) a true 64bit compiler, which doesn't need the runtime etc

BTW, the "A" in VFPA is the next HEX sign after 9, or a 10 in Dec. But it also 
fits with the "Advanced" tag :)

VFPA is already around since several years, and Mr.Chen seems to be very 
knowledgable with Assembler and debugging C++ machinecode :)

Personally I use the regular 32bit version without any problems at my customers 
site. It behaves just as a usual VFP9 without some quirks. I was bitten by 
those report-engine bugs as well as the Grid-Optimize problem, and with VFPA 
this stuff just works.  You just do a "recompile all" on your project, put your 
EXE and that single VFPAR.DLL to your customer and that's all.  One caveat: 
VFPA hast he language-Resource-DLL included, thus you need different VFPAR.dll 
for different langauges. (Personally I don't like that approach, since you 
can't run in a multi-language scenario anymore, where VFP picks the language 
DLL according to the user settings)

Also I'm not really convinced about the need for the 64bit version. At least 
not for existing desktop applications. As soon as you have some FLLs or OCXs 
included, you're basically toasted, since you need those as a 64bit version.
Since most of the VFP specific addons are already 15 years old,  the chances to 
get those vendors to compile their old stuff into a 64bit version are somewhat 
desillusional.

Then: what do you gain from a 64bit version? You don't get over the 2Gb limit 
for DBFs, it's just that it can address more RAM. Ok, when did you ran out of 
RAM with a VFP version, where the engine was built to work even on
PCs with as little as 64MB RAM?    You also have a marketing plus, because
you're now a native 64bit app. And it may run a little bit faster because of 
the unneeded 32Bit layer in Windows.  As long as you don't need any of your old 
addons....

But it does have a valid usecase for Middle-tier applications, like 
ActiveFoxProPages or AFPX or FIC, where the VFP engine connects directly to 
64bit WebServers.
BTW: @ChristofWollenhaupt: did you already compiled the AFP engine with VFPA?

The third option, a true compiler, is stil work in progress. It does work, but 
stil has the same restrictions as option b). Mr.Chen is working to enhance the 
limitations at various parts like max. Stringlength, max DBF size etc, but 
there are a lot of complications.

woOdy



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to