On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Paul H. Tarver <[email protected]> wrote: > saying that with today's > strongly typed variables, notation like this is useless and should be > avoided. > > Quite frankly, it hacked me off
I completely agree *if you are using a strongly-typed language* that including the type-prefix in the variable/field names is redundant. VFP is NOT strongly typed, so sometimes it's handy. Any standard, even an arbitrary one, is better than a system that mixes Hungarian with camelCase with the next cool naming scheme. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4sb6pb5dhuithwf98zpe-bpakaam_my3v6mqr7u5hy...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
