VFP dead? Better not tell the guys at VFPx. Laurie
On 26 July 2016 at 08:49, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, at 07:07 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote: > > VFP is dead. Forget about it. Learn a new too and move on. > > Yeah, except many people have very, very large and perfectly working > systems written in VFP (or COBOL or whatever else) where even if the > customer base would fund a wholesale rewrite, it wouldn't happen in a 5 > or 10 year period. Therefore containerisation and similar approaches > like Centennial are an excellent solution. > > -- > Alan Bourke > alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAMvTR9f7wt=9g+WBXPnbivHZCxkMP0mJ=tnhrsc99G-r=ai...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
