At 07:49 2016-03-10, [email protected] wrote:
[snip]
Well that's basically what I'm doing, but it's in a framework so
re-use is key. You don't put this after each task-specific SQL;
that's why I had that subroutine. (Am I showing my age there? Does
anybody say 'subroutine' anymore??? Reminds me of learning FORTRAN
in the LATE 80s at Penn State!)
"subroutine" is a perfectly good word. So is "procedure".
I love explaining OOP as procedural programming where the
procedure calls might not be obvious.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
